X-Authentication-Warning:	kendall.sfbr.org: jeffw set sender to jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org using -f
Date:	Tue, 2 Sep 2003 10:42:29 -0500
From:	JT Williams <jeffw AT darwin DOT sfbr DOT org>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: /dev/c - c: or c:/ ?
Message-ID:	<20030902154229.GB4599@kendall.sfbr.org>
Mail-Followup-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
References:	<3405-Mon01Sep2003191913+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <002a01c370ca$b51801e0$2202a8c0 AT dualzastai>
Mime-Version:	1.0
In-Reply-To:	<002a01c370ca$b51801e0$2202a8c0@dualzastai>
User-Agent:	Mutt/1.4.1i
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

-: > I guess one important related question is what does `pwd' produce
-: > when the current directory is "c:/"?
-: 
-: c:/
-: bash's pwd builtin returns c:/, /dev/c, or /dev/c/ based on what you cd'd
-: to.

This must be a djgpp-ism?  (There's no equivalent of /dev/c
under Linux or Solaris, is there?)  Anyway, it does seem
desirable that "cd `pwd`" DTRT....

- Raw text -