Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3F511F44.12A859CF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 30 Aug 2003 23:03:48 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: <math.h> and <libm/math.h>
References:	<1cd DOT fda5102 DOT 2c7e5b12 AT aol DOT com> <3F50B64F DOT F5AC9380 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <9743-Sat30Aug2003204430+0300-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Sat, 30 Aug 2003 15:35:59 +0100
> > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> >
> > I think we can assume standard C for DJGPP.
> 
> Yes.
> 
> > Why don't we move everything from <libm/math.h> into <math.h> and make
> > <libm/math.h> just include <math.h>?
> 
> That's what I suggested the other day.

Sorry. I thought that you had suggested it the other way round. But you are
quite right - I just misremembered.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -