Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3F3A7C5D.970E75D1@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 13 Aug 2003 18:58:53 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Anomaly in printf()
References:	<46 DOT 3c4de930 DOT 2c6a2e90 AT aol DOT com> <Pine DOT OSF DOT 4 DOT 51 DOT 0308131046310 DOT 2694 AT sirppi DOT helsinki DOT fi>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Esa A E Peuha wrote:
[snip]
> I agree.  This should definitely divide by ten to produce as accurate
> result as possible.  Multiplying by 0.1 will cause errors when the
> number has large absolute value.  Could someone test the following patch
> before I commit it?
[snip]

How about running it through the Cygnus test suite? That's what I'd do, to
test it.

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -