From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200306211138.h5LBcwi3013425@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: LIBC C files patches to build with GCC 3.3 (non math files)
In-Reply-To:	<002201c337b1$b3fdce40$0100a8c0@acp42g> "from Andrew Cottrell at
	Jun 21, 2003 02:58:05 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 21 Jun 2003 13:38:58 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Andrew Cottrell:
> *** \djgppcvs\include\libc\ieee.h Wed Feb  5 18:10:52 2003
> --- ieee.h Sat Jun 21 14:44:38 2003
> *************** typedef struct {
> *** 38,43 ****
> --- 38,62 ----
>     unsigned sign:1;
>   } long_double_t;
> 
> +
> + typedef union
> + {
> +   double d;
> +   double_t dt;
> + } _double_union_t;
> +
> + typedef union
> + {
> +   long double ld;
> +   long_double_t ldt;
> + } longdouble_union_t;

Why not stay out of the applications name space by naming this one
_longdouble_union_t? And perhaps it should be _long_double_union_t
too?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -