Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/06/10/15:06:09
Hello.
CBFalconer wrote:
>
> CBFalconer wrote:
> >
> > Richard Dawe wrote:
> > >
> > > I was thinking we could do DJGPP 2.04 alpha 2 later this month.
> > > Reasons:
> > >
> > > (1) uclock now works on Windows 2000 and later.
> > > (2) gcc 3.2.3 has a bugfix for the struct passing issue.
> > > (3) A few other minor fixes that I can think of.
> > >
> > > The binary compatibility issue (2) is probably the main reason
> > > for releasing alpha 2. If people don't think that's important,
> > > then maybe we should wait a while longer.
> >
> > I guess I better rise up off my rump and do those compile time
> > options for nmalloc :-)
>
> Done. The result is at:
>
> <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net/download/nmalloc.zip>
>
> and compiles with no warnings with -W -Wall -O2. It no longer
> needs -DNDEBUG, instead the inverse is controlled with
> -DNEWMALLDBG, so omission gives the production result.
Thanks. I'll try to take a look at it at the weekend.
> I could not use gcc.opt, since that collection makes the command lines
> too long, and I could not find a way to include a reference to it in
> the compile command.
Try:
gcc @c:/some/path/gcc.opt <other-options>
Although you should get this stuff for free, by using the same style of
Makefile as is used elsewhere in the DJGPP sources.
Have you tried modifying a CVS check-out to build with nmalloc?
> Note that the library needs to include both nmalloc.o and
> malldbg.o, so that the debug code will not be loaded unless
> referenced. I leave it to you to install the contents of
> malldbg.h and sysquery.h in stdlib.h.
OK.
Thanks, bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -