Message-ID:	<006401c32f3a$dde2e8f0$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<3EE4EB66 DOT DF7891D2 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 alpha 2 later in the month?
Date:	Tue, 10 Jun 2003 20:27:16 +1000
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1158
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1165
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> I was thinking we could do DJGPP 2.04 alpha 2 later this month. Reasons:
>
> (1) uclock now works on Windows 2000 and later.
> (2) gcc 3.2.3 has a bugfix for the struct passing issue.
> (3) A few other minor fixes that I can think of.
(4) Fix missing files docs from some of the zips.
(5) Supply LIBC patches in order to support GCC 3.3 for building LIBC
without any patches.

Added (4) and (5).

> The binary compatibility issue (2) is probably the main reason for
releasing
> alpha 2. If people don't think that's important, then maybe we should wait
a
> while longer.

I still have the following items in my DJGPP mail box waiting for me to
check on their status to see ig I can delete them or spend time on them:-
1 - Richard:- fstat, fd_props and inventing nodes patch - awaiting copyright
paperwork
2 - Andrew:- GCC 3.3 patchs - need to be re-worked
3 - KB Williams:- cygnus LIBC tests patch

I also have a number of GCC 3.3 specific issues that have been sent over the
last month that are also waiting for time.

Andrew

- Raw text -