Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3EE4E728.AB25A8CB@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 09 Jun 2003 20:59:36 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: pakke usage
References:	<3EE3BCE3 DOT A8052E70 AT yahoo DOT com> <000d01c32e1d$b2147400$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3EE4076D DOT F20AA54D AT yahoo DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

CBFalconer wrote:
> 
> Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> >
> > ..snip..
> > > > [1] c:\djgpp>pakke -i -v grep24b.zip
> >
> > ..snip..
> > > > grep24b.zip: 'grep24b.zip' does not contain a DSM
> > > > Error: Unable to parse DSM!
> >
> > Grab the grep 2.5.1 from the alpha 1 release as it does contain a dsm.
> 
> OK, that will probably handle that particular problem, but what
> about in general?  The file listings I showed had a dsm for
> grep24.  Why doesn't pakke use it?

pakke doesn't use the DSM, because you didn't use the DSM to install grep 2.4.
If you don't use pakke to install a package, you can use --syncdb to make it
try to match a DSM to the package. See:

    info pakke synchronising

Also, it would be better to send user-level questions to comp.os.msdos.djgpp
or pakke-workers AT yahoogroups DOT com (or both). comp.os.msdos.djgpp is probably
better, because then other DJGPP users may be able to help you (and it raises
the profile of pakke ;) ).

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -