Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3ED79572.44D0FBF5@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Fri, 30 May 2003 18:31:30 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: uclock() still out by 1 in 65536
References:	<4wyBa.45993$1s1 DOT 615094 AT newsfeeds DOT bigpond DOT com> <200305300208 DOT h4U28vDV031441 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3ED6C0EB DOT 3080403 AT bigpond DOT com> <200305300229 DOT h4U2T5vd031704 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> <3ED6CF29 DOT 5060803 AT bigpond DOT com> <000e01c32663$436b9e50$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <3ED6E375 DOT 60909 AT bigpond DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Ben Peddell wrote:
[snip]
> I am using 2.03 on MS-DOS. I also had a look at the code mirrored at
> <http://www.ludd.luth.se/~ams/djgpp/cvs/>, and it also showed that it's
> programming the clock to 65535 cycles per tic instead of 65536 cycles
> per tic. Can't seem to find the code you're talking about there.
[snip]

It doesn't look like Martin has updated it for a while. The tarball is
certainly pre-2.04 alpha 1.

You can get the latest code using the cvsweb interface on DJ's site. It's
linked from the DJGPP front page.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -