delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sat, 10 May 2003 12:50:17 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <2950-Sat10May2003125017+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <3EBBF6E4.CF2893B9@yahoo.com> (message from CBFalconer on Fri, 09 |
May 2003 14:43:48 -0400) | |
Subject: | Re: Reducing sbrk test on nmalloc] |
References: | <3EBBF6E4 DOT CF2893B9 AT yahoo DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Fri, 09 May 2003 14:43:48 -0400 > From: CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> > > You gave me all sorts of trouble by sending this to my sp**am > trap. > Note the reply-to address please. Since djgpp-workers is a mailing list, you should expect replies to get to your From: address as well. > The unused warnings are expected The library build doesn't tolerate warnings, as we use -Werror. So please make changes to eliminate _all_ warnings. It is advisable to build the code using the exact set of compiler switches used by the library build (see the file src/gcc.opt in the library sources).
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |