Message-ID:	<3EAE6ABE.4FACA25F@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 29 Apr 2003 08:06:22 -0400
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Bug 00314 -- div() still broken
References:	<200304280701 DOT JAA02652 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3EAE54B4 DOT 1882F3CF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> Martin Stromberg wrote:
> > Richard said:
> > > ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> >
> > > > I wouldn't do an announcement. I don't think we should
> > > > spread this any further. I suggest you remove any gcc and
> > > > libraries with this error.
> > >
> > > Too late.
> >
> > Yes, I noticed. But it's not too late to remove it. (I
> > envision that incompatible packages will make a
> > maintainence/debugging nightmare.)
> 
> If we could fix it in gcc 3.2.3, then we could say: Are you using
> 3.0 < gcc <= 3.2.3? If the answer is yes, then just say "upgrade".
> That avoids the whole problem with finding out file dates, release
> numbers, etc. that we would have with 3.0 <= gcc < 3.2.3

You can still say that.  It will just happen to be unnecessary now
and then.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -