Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/04/29/07:16:02
Hello.
Martin Stromberg wrote:
>
> Richard said:
> > ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
> > > I wouldn't do an announcement. I don't think we should spread this
> > > any further. I suggest you remove any gcc and libraries with this
> > > error.
> >
> > Too late.
>
> Yes, I noticed. But it's not too late to remove it. (I envision that
> incompatible packages will make a maintainence/debugging nightmare.)
If we could fix it in gcc 3.2.3, then we could say: Are you using 3.0 <= gcc <
3.2.3? If the answer is yes, then just say "upgrade". That avoids the whole
problem with finding out file dates, release numbers, etc. that we would have
with 3.0 <= gcc < 3.2.3
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -