From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200304271703.h3RH39p2004600@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: Yet another try on nan in strto{f,d,ld}
In-Reply-To:	<7458-Sat26Apr2003201303+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> "from Eli Zaretskii
	at Apr 26, 2003 08:13:04 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 19:03:09 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: <ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
> Date: Sat, 26 Apr 2003 17:06:32 +0200 (CEST)
> 
> When run, it says:
> 
> FPU CW: 0x0000037f.
> d = NaN.
> FPU CW: 0x00000340.
> d = NaN.
> 
> I. e. no crash traceback. Does that answer the question?

Uhoh! That was run in WINDOZE 98. In plain DOZE I get SIGFPE. Is that
bad?

(I'm not sure I have time to mess with this.)


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -