From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10304271723.AA27189@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: t-strtof discrepancies
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 27 Apr 2003 12:23:25 -0500 (CDT)
Cc:	ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se
In-Reply-To:	<2110-Sat26Apr2003201700+0300-eliz@elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Apr 26, 2003 08:17:00 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > E. g. Test 12 above shows 6.87747e-39 with emulation and 2e-39
> > without
> 
> Sounds like a serious bug in the emulator, something that should be
> fixed, IMHO.

If you run the math test suites with and without emulator you will
see other similar numerical deviations.  But they seem confined to
small values.  Since all recent processors contain FPUs in hardware,
I don't think this is a huge issue anymore (not enough that anyone
will want to spend time on it...)

- Raw text -