Date:	Sat, 26 Apr 2003 01:13:00 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu
Message-Id:	<3028-Sat26Apr2003011258+0300-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<10304252113.AA21892@clio.rice.edu> (sandmann@clio.rice.edu)
Subject:	Re: nmalloc revisited
References:	<10304252113 DOT AA21892 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> Date: Fri, 25 Apr 2003 16:13:34 -0500 (CDT)
> 
> > Is that objective harmed in any way by having the files separate
> > and #included in stdlib.h under the appropriate conditions?
> 
> No, but complexity and speed are.  If it would always be included
> by stdlib.h it should just go in stdlib.h

I agree.

- Raw text -