From:	Andris Pavenis <pavenis AT latnet DOT lv>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Subject:	Re: 2.04 status page / 2.04 alpha 1 release schedule
Date:	Wed, 23 Apr 2003 19:25:05 +0300
User-Agent:	KMail/1.5.1
Cc:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk (Richard Dawe)
References:	<10304231413 DOT AA17191 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
In-Reply-To:	<10304231413.AA17191@clio.rice.edu>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Message-Id:	<200304231925.05177.pavenis@latnet.lv>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

On Wednesday 23 April 2003 17:13, Charles Sandmann wrote:
> > > AFAIK the only stuff that may not have gone in completely is the DXE3
> > > stuff. I may make some build-system fixes, if it doesn't build
> > > everything we need for the ZIPs.
> >
> > DXE3 is not in there.
>
> I started committing things last night, and plan to finish today.  I wanted
> to fix a few of the things in the review before first check in.
>
> > No. I have been using this since the 3.2.2. was released by Andris.
>
> I think 3.2.2 is appropriate for the build/release.

I haven't met problems yet with 3.2.2 building DJGPP CVS version.
I'm using rather recent CVS version for my own applications as they would no 
more work with 2.03.

My experience shows, that gcc-3.1 was NOT OK, as I got broken 
div(). Upgrading cross-compiler from gcc-3.1 to gcc-3.2.2 fixed the problem.

Most likely gcc-2.95.3 is OK, but I haven't verified it for a long time. I 
don't even have it installed.

gcc-3.3 prerelease snapshots would require some changes of sources. Also
the builds I made available earlier have one bug, which prevents building
DJGPP CVS version even if I remove -Werror. It's fixed now, but currently 
a machine where I made these snapshots available is gone.

Andris

- Raw text -