From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200304221830.h3MIUvxW008929@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: @var, -, @code?
In-Reply-To:	<3EA52D96.14D87106@yahoo.com> "from CBFalconer at Apr 22, 2003 07:55:02
	am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2003 20:30:57 +0200 (CEST)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to CBFalconer:
> That has a different emphasis.  IMO the first thing the user wants
> to know is what to pass in that parameter.  The second is what it
> does.  Thus possibly:
> 
>    If @var{endp} is not a null pointer, a pointer to the first
>    unconverted character will be stored in the location pointed 
>    to by @var(endp).  Thus endp is normally the address of a
>    pointer to a char (or NULL).

Ok. I'll go with this one.

> Don't know why I am sticking my nose in here.  :-)

Go ahead, your welcome.


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -