X-Sybari-Space:	00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
From:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200304221509.RAA06409@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject:	Re: Yet another try on nan in strto{f,d,ld}
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 22 Apr 2003 17:09:07 +0200 (MET DST)
In-Reply-To:	<3EA53652.200F23BD@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> from "Richard Dawe" at Apr 22, 2003 01:32:18 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Richard said:
> > I mean the plain typecasts, like this:
> > 
> >     +    double_t n = *(double_t *)(&tmp_d);
> > 
> > or this:
> > 
> >     +   return *(double *)(&n);
> [snip]
> 
> As I understand it, restrict'ed variables are strictly aliased.

Uuhhh... "strictly aliased"?

Anyway, are you saying that tmp_d, n or *(double *)(&n) is strictly
aliased, restrict qualified or in anyway will become so when we add
restrict to the function's parameters? Why? Howcome? (Note that tmp_d
and n are local variables.)


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -