Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E97FA89.5A3223AF@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 12 Apr 2003 12:37:45 +0100
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Perl 5.8.0 diffs
References:	<3E9470A3 DOT 99362D5 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <20030410082836 DOT I6644 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se> <005801c2ff52$32e0a720$0100a8c0 AT acp42g> <20030410165217 DOT O6644 AT libra DOT eth DOT ericsson DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Laszlo Molnar wrote:
> 
> On Thu, Apr 10, 2003 at 09:13:21PM +1000, Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> > > http://www.iki.fi/jhi/perl AT 19105 DOT tgz
> > Please let me know if and when you want me to do a build to put on clio.
> 
> Unfortunately lots of tests are failing in perl 5.8.x. Some times ago
> I've given up supporting short file names, because that was one of the
> main reasons which produced the failures. As nowdays I have access only
> to linux + dosemu, my testing capabilities are quite limited...

I have a few patches to the Perl 5.8.0 tarball. It would be good if they could
be incorporated into Perl 5.8.1, so it works better out-of-the-box. Should I
send these patches to you or directly to the Perl maintainers?

Are you still actively maintaining DJGPP support in the Perl development
versions? (It doesn't sound like it to me, but perhaps you are.)

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -