From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200303221215.h2MCFPR22380@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	djgpp: djgpp/src/libm/math/makefile
To:	DJGPP-WORKERS <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Date:	Sat, 22 Mar 2003 13:15:25 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore:	s
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

I checked in:
> From lnobody AT delorie DOT com Sat Mar 22 13:11:50 2003
> Date: Sat, 22 Mar 2003 07:09:10 -0500
> Message-Id: <200303221209 DOT h2MC9An19018 AT delorie DOT com>
> To: djgpp-cvs AT delorie DOT com
> From: "cvs-ams AT delorie DOT com" <cvs AT delorie DOT com>
> Subject: djgpp: djgpp/src/libm/math/makefile
> 
> Update by cvs id: ams
> Update of /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/libm/math
> 
> Modified Files:
> 	makefile 
> Log Message:
> Use __dj_huge_val from libc instead of __infinity from libm.
> 
> ===================================================================
> RCS file: /cvs/djgpp/djgpp/src/libm/math/makefile,v
> retrieving revision 1.1
> retrieving revision 1.2
> diff -p -2 -r1.1 -r1.2
> *** djgpp/src/libm/math/makefile	15 Nov 1998 13:54:18 -0000	1.1
> --- djgpp/src/libm/math/makefile	22 Mar 2003 12:09:08 -0000	1.2
> *************** SRC += s_infinity.c
> *** 84,88 ****
>   SRC += s_isinf.c
>   SRC += s_nan.c
> ! SRC += s_infconst.c
>   SRC += s_signgam.c
>   SRC += kf_rem_pio2.c
> --- 84,88 ----
>   SRC += s_isinf.c
>   SRC += s_nan.c
> ! #SRC += s_infconst.c
>   SRC += s_signgam.c
>   SRC += kf_rem_pio2.c

Should s_infconst.c be cvs removed now?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -