Message-ID:	<3E771074.9845E8C5@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2003 07:26:28 -0500
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: nmalloc revisited
References:	<200303141601 DOT RAA26911 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> <3E721051 DOT 645AA67D AT yahoo DOT com> <3E74B558 DOT 3629CBA9 AT yahoo DOT com> <1438-Sun16Mar2003203300+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E74E454 DOT BC734243 AT yahoo DOT com> <3E753E85 DOT 81830981 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E755250 DOT 837B3606 AT yahoo DOT com> <3E75B36C DOT 6327581D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E75E6E1 DOT A3989CD6 AT yahoo DOT com> <3E7616BC DOT E333FA24 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3E762E23 DOT A2F38193 AT yahoo DOT com> <3028-Tue18Mar2003091343+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
... snip ...
> 
> I don't have anything against replacing the result with a better
> implementation, but would appreciate it a lot if you spared me the
> "FOUL FOUL FOUL" attitude in the process.

This warrants an apology from me.  While I dislike the interface,
the comment was uncalled for.

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -