X-Sybari-Trust:	0cde9767 9ffcebbb 7a95d2f4 00000138
From:	Martin Stromberg <Martin DOT Stromberg AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200303181339.OAA03927@lws256.lu.erisoft.se>
Subject:	Re: elefunt results
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Tue, 18 Mar 2003 14:39:21 +0100 (MET)
In-Reply-To:	<2593-Tue18Mar2003143417+0200-eliz@elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Mar 18, 2003 02:34:17 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL3]
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

Eli said:
> FWIW, I think it's better to use an explicit "./foo" paradigm than
> fiddle with the value of PATH in the Makefile.

I do too. Except that makefile is some multi-make one. If we don't
care about other make implementations I could clean it up (and use
./).


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -