From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200303090959.h299xsc05662@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: lseek code & doc fixes [PATCH]
In-Reply-To:	<E18rL9L-0000vc-00@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> "from Richard Dawe at
	Mar 7, 2003 04:59:47 pm"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sun, 9 Mar 2003 10:59:53 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Richard Dawe:
> The recent refactoring of lseek to use llseek seems to have introduced
> a bug. Namely: the error checking checks the wrong variable, to see
> if llseek failed.

Duh! Thanks!


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -