Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E693B47.ED29CDFC@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 08 Mar 2003 00:37:27 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
Subject:	Portability tags [Was: Re: New POSIX: pwrite [PATCH]]
References:	<E18rMih-00011k-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200303071845 DOT h27Ij5d18334 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

DJ Delorie wrote:
[snip]
> > + @portability !ansi, !posix-1003.2-1992, posix-1003.1-2001
> 
> I'm wondering if, given the plethora of new standards coming out, we
> should rethink how the portability tags work. 

Which standards? (It'd be nice to have a list, so we can update mkdoc.)

> Maybe we should just note the standards where the functions were first
> introduced, and elide the !s for superceded standards?  I.e., in this
> case, the two !s would be redundant if you say it was added in
> posix-1003.1-2001.

That sounds better. I think it would also result in more pleasant code that
the code I added to mkdoc.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -