Date:	Sat, 01 Mar 2003 13:51:26 +0200
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id:	<2427-Sat01Mar2003135126+0200-eliz@elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3E5C1B27.47B225B@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:40:55 +0000)
Subject:	Re: Implementation of fchmod [PATCH]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030206081714 DOT 6656L-100000 AT is> <3E54E663 DOT 5F32DFF7 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <2427-Sat22Feb2003220304+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E5B6452 DOT 82F4D938 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <7263-Tue25Feb2003211713+0200-eliz AT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E5C1B27 DOT 47B225B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 01:40:55 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> > 
> > Call isatty on the handle; if it returns zero, the handle is
> > redirected.
> 
> But can we assume file descriptors 0, 1, etc. are actually standard handles?

Yes.  Many programs will break beyond recognition otherwise.  As an
example, consider our crash traceback: it is written to file handle 2
without any tests.

- Raw text -