Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/02/20/15:19:39
DJ Delorie wrote:
>
> > __FSEXT_llseek,
> > __FSEXT_readlink,
> > __FSEXT_symlink,
> > + __FSEXT_chmod,
> > + __FSEXT_chown,
> > __FSEXT_fchown
> > } __FSEXT_Fnumber;
>
> Why aren't new entries added at the bottom? This way, the value
> of __FSEXT_fchown changes.
Probably to avoid the hassle of modifying an extra line. Maybe it
should define "__FSEXT_invalid" as the last to remove the
temptation in future :-) I assume this is an enumeration.
--
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
<http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
- Raw text -