From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10302142005.AA22053@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: djasm in djasm?
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Fri, 14 Feb 2003 14:05:26 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To:	<200302141822.h1EIMO102255@speedy.ludd.luth.se> from "ams@ludd.luth.se" at Feb 14, 2003 07:22:24 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> There was at least one request for moving djasm to it's own
> directory. I'm in favour.
> 
> I've moved stub/djasm* to djasm/ ("mkdir djasm; mv stub/djasm* djasm")
> and have a successful compilation.

This seems reasonable to me also - as long as it all works.  The 
includes for the utils documentation need to be fixed too.   

> As a bonus we can stop relaxing warnings for stub/, which will give us
> at least one new warning for the files left there.

Sounds like a good thing.

- Raw text -