Message-ID:	<3E44F0E5.3070404@mif.vu.lt>
Date:	Sat, 08 Feb 2003 12:58:29 +0100
From:	Laurynas Biveinis <laurynas DOT biveinis AT mif DOT vu DOT lt>
Organization:	VU MIF
User-Agent:	Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.2.1) Gecko/20021130
X-Accept-Language:	lt, en, en-us
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com, Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Subject:	Re: FSEXT hooks and symlinks
References:	<3D048EF2 DOT 455CD32B AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <161256143054 DOT 20020626173357 AT softhome DOT net> <3E43F543 DOT EC75DCB8 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
In-Reply-To:	<3E43F543.EC75DCB8@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
X-OriginalArrivalTime:	08 Feb 2003 10:55:25.0617 (UTC) FILETIME=[95C2B210:01C2CF60]
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Richard Dawe wrote:
> I think the __FSEXT_call_open_handlers_wrapper call should be after the
> __solve_dir_symlinks call. Is it OK to change them around?

Please.

--
Laurynas

- Raw text -