Date:	Thu, 6 Feb 2003 19:24:08 +0200 (IST)
From:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
X-Sender:	eliz AT is
To:	Esa A E Peuha <peuha AT cc DOT helsinki DOT fi>
cc:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: Add @tindex for types in docs [PATCH]
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.OSF.4.51.0302061313110.25275@sirppi.helsinki.fi>
Message-ID:	<Pine.SUN.3.91.1030206192333.17951C-100000@is>
MIME-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

On Thu, 6 Feb 2003, Esa A E Peuha wrote:

> I realize that, but the .txh files are only read by mkdoc, and mkdoc
> already uses @node with syntax that is far from that of Texinfo, and
> @portability and @port-note which have no Texinfo equivalents.  So using
> another @-construct to tell mkdoc how to handle the node wouldn't be any
> more problematic with Texinfo.

If you meant that @mkdoc will be followed by some info, I don't object to 
such a change.

- Raw text -