delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:44:00 +0200 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <5567-Wed05Feb2003174359+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <3E410279.C78ACB52@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
Dawe on Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:24:25 +0000) | |
Subject: | Re: djgpp: djgpp/include/string.h,strings.h |
References: | <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030205082604 DOT 15128I-100000 AT is> <3E410279 DOT C78ACB52 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Wed, 05 Feb 2003 12:24:25 +0000 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > > > Richard, did you try to see whether an old GCC version swallows this > > successfully? Like compile a program with GCC 2.7.2.x or 2.8? > [snip] > > Er, no. But I don't see why I wouldn't work. gcc 3.x currently defaults to C89 > mode, which means it doesn't define __STDC_VERSION__. So when it comes to > evaluating this #if/#endif, gcc 2.x and gcc 3.x should behave the same, > which their default settings (e.g.: no -std=c<whatever> or > -std=gnu<whatever>). We introduce this for the benefit of older versions of GCC. So I think we should test this with those older versions, to make sure we don't break those users who still have them installed. > Oh. Or do you mean the line-continuation charactre in the multi-line > #if/#endif? I mean everything ;-)
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |