| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Date: | Wed, 05 Feb 2003 17:25:19 +0200 |
| From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
| Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Message-Id: | <9743-Wed05Feb2003172519+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
| X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
| In-reply-to: | <3E4038B6.3D1F9E95@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard |
| Dawe on Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:03:34 +0000) | |
| Subject: | Re: chmod, chown FSEXT hooks |
| References: | <3E4038B6 DOT 3D1F9E95 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> Date: Tue, 04 Feb 2003 22:03:34 +0000 > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> > > Is there any reason why chmod and chown don't have FSEXT hooks? Lack of practical need, I suppose. > It seems like chmod & chown should FSEXT hooks too. I don't object.
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |