delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Message-ID: | <3E3D3E71.75DDBF14@yahoo.com> |
Date: | Sun, 02 Feb 2003 10:51:13 -0500 |
From: | CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com> |
Organization: | Ched Research |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U) |
X-Accept-Language: | en |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: <errno.h> and C99: EILSEQ [PATCH] |
References: | <E18fLVs-0000iE-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Richard Dawe wrote: > > Can anyone confirm that EILSEQ definitely wasn't in C89? I am > assuming that it wasn't, because it wasn't in the header before. According to a google cache copy I have here: <http://web.onetelnet.ch/~twolf/tw/c/c9x_changes.html> it is new in C99, introduced in C94. Whatever that means. -- Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net) Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems. <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net> USE worldnet address!
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |