| delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
| Sender: | rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk |
| Message-ID: | <3E3C59DB.9F480DF7@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
| Date: | Sat, 01 Feb 2003 23:35:55 +0000 |
| From: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
| X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) |
| X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
| MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
| To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
| Subject: | Re: restrict |
| References: | <200302011404 DOT h11E4rb15460 AT speedy DOT ludd DOT luth DOT se> |
| Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Hello.
ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se wrote:
>
> Hello.
>
> We have a problem. gcc only recognise "restrict" if "-std=c99" is
> given on the command line.
Perhaps we should add that flag to gcc.opt?
> So we'll need some macro or some way knowing when c99 is in
> effect. Alas I can't find one. I've been looking at the verbose output
> from gcc.
>
> Any ideas?
C99 standard, section 6.10.8: "Predefined macro names" includes:
__STDC_VERSION__ The integer constant 199901L.
It says in the footnote that the previous version was 199409L.
Bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
| webmaster | delorie software privacy |
| Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |