Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E330DB3.DDDFBAD2@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Sat, 25 Jan 2003 22:20:35 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	Eli Zaretskii <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
CC:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: ssize_t: int -> signed long [PATCH]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030123081522 DOT 15630C AT is> <3E2FB5F0 DOT B7FD75FC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1659-Thu23Jan2003203612+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E304571 DOT BFA087FF AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3791-Fri24Jan2003214724+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> <3E319B0C DOT D99F6005 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <3405-Sat25Jan2003194243+0200-eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Eli Zaretskii wrote:
> 
> > Date: Fri, 24 Jan 2003 19:59:08 +0000
> > From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
[snip]
> > So we would pollute <stdio.h> with ssize_t, if FILE._cnt is an ssize_t.
> > Shall I revert FILE._cnt to a long?
> 
> I'd go for having ssize_t in stdio.h regardless.  IMHO, a typedef does
> not do any harm, unless the program which includes stdio.h defines its
> own type under the name ssize_t.  But if others feel strongly against
> doing that, I guess we need to go back with FILE._cnt.

If there are no objections, I'll commit it with FILE._cnt as ssize_t on
Wednesday.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -