Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2003/01/23/16:23:49
Hello.
Laurynas Biveinis wrote:
>
> Richard Dawe wrote:
[snip]
> > The test cases that failed are in the CVS xsymlink test. I haven't added
> > any test cases to that for a while. The tests that fail are the ones that
> > take the current directory, count the number of slashes (n_slashes) and
> > then prepend lots of ".."s to the path without the directory
> > (cwd_without_drive).
>
> Uhm, I guess I have a problem with my setup here - these test cases
> don't fail for me. Maybe you have some piece of advice?
[snip]
> Test 3: Solving
> c:../../../../../../../devel/djgpp/tests/libc/compat/unistd/test1
> Test 3 passed
[snip]
This test still fails for me.
I removed all the fail* and test* in the test directory, did a cvs update of
the entire tree, make clean && make all, rebuilt the test.
The only change I have in this tree is for fstat and constant inode numbers.
The test doesn't even contain the code for fstat, so I don't think that's the
problem.
Could you try a cvs update, clean and rebuild please? What other diffs do you
have in your tree?
> >>>* symlinks between drives;
> >>
> >>Will see, the problem is that not everybody has multiple drives...
> >
> >
> > Most computers have a floppy drive, don't they?
>
> So we will require user to insert blank formatted diskette into drive
> A:, won't we? Somehow it does not look reasonable for me :)
Maybe the test "xsymlink" should take a drive specifier. It could then create
a cross-drive symlink to any file on that disk. E.g. c:/temp/foo ->
d:/whatever.
Thanks, bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -