delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Date: | Sun, 19 Jan 2003 19:33:22 +0300 |
From: | "Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il> |
Sender: | halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Message-Id: | <7458-Sun19Jan2003193322+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> |
X-Mailer: | emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9 |
In-reply-to: | <200301191611.RAA01832@lws256.lu.erisoft.se> (message from Martin |
Stromberg on Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:11:36 +0100 (MET)) | |
Subject: | Re: Updated 2.04 status page |
References: | <200301191611 DOT RAA01832 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Errors-To: | nobody AT delorie DOT com |
X-Mailing-List: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
X-Unsubscribes-To: | listserv AT delorie DOT com |
> From: Martin Stromberg <eplmst AT epl DOT ericsson DOT se> > Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2003 17:11:36 +0100 (MET) > > How about compatibility with earlier gccs? I think we shouldn't break older compilers: people are still using them (and for good reasons IMHO). > Add soemthing like > "#if GCC_VERSION < X > #define restrict > #endif" Yes, that's the idea. > Where if so? How about version.h? It's always #includ'ed by default.
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |