From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10301182127.AA13863@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: djasm.txi?
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2003 15:27:15 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To:	<7263-Sat18Jan2003221119+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il> from "Eli Zaretskii" at Jan 18, 2003 10:11:20 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> > From: sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
> > Date: Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:46:55 -0600 (CST)
> > 
> > Maybe the file should be moved; does @include work with ../stub/djasm.txi
> > type syntax?
> 
> It should, but I think it's better to use the -I switch to makeinfo.
> That way, we can move the file around at will.

With the current makefile structure I don't see any way to easily do 
-I (the .inf make rule is in the common file makefile.inc).

So should new include files go in their own directories with a ../ type
include?

Should docs for go32-v2, stubify, stubedit, exe2coff be in ../stub ?
Should docs for dxegen be in ../dxe ?

- Raw text -