From:	sandmann AT clio DOT rice DOT edu (Charles Sandmann)
Message-Id:	<10301181946.AA24229@clio.rice.edu>
Subject:	Re: djasm.txi?
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Sat, 18 Jan 2003 13:46:55 -0600 (CST)
In-Reply-To:	<200301181656.h0IGukD21490@brother.ludd.luth.se> from "Martin Str|mberg" at Jan 18, 2003 05:56:46 PM
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.5 PL2]
Mime-Version:	1.0
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Why is djasm.txi in src/utils and not in src/stub?

There is no top level utils documentation make - it appears to all be 
done from the makefile in src/utils.  The utils.tex file includes
djasm.txi

Maybe the file should be moved; does @include work with ../stub/djasm.txi
type syntax?

This is also important to me as I was planning to provide documentation
for some of the missing utilities; in particular dxegen will need 
documentation.  I had not decided yet if it should live in 
src/utils/dxegen.txi and be included by utils.tex, or be in 
src/dxe/dxegen.txi (and be included with ../... syntax).

Maybe we need something new like the libc makedoc process for utils?
I'm too lazy to worry about it and was just planning to add more
includes.

- Raw text -