Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E257974.A62307F0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Wed, 15 Jan 2003 15:08:36 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: C99 math functions
References:	<200301151329 DOT OAA24205 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Martin Stromberg wrote:
> I saw some time ago a link to the new C99 math functions. I think it
> was Richard that posted. Let me call him X.

Yes, I am the mysterious Mr. X. ;) But Mr. W (K. B. Williams) wrote the code.
 
> I don't use much (any?) math in my puny programs. Would it still be
> beneficial to apply that patch and compile it?

If someone else wants to take a look, yes. Although it compiles fine for me.

> I suppose I could run some test suite, but that's already done I
> suppose by X. Would it still be beneficial to run it?

AFAIK K. B. Williams hasn't written a test suite yet. If you have some
programs that use C99 maths functions and some way of checking their
behaviour, then please run it against K. B. Williams's code.

I haven't had much time to look at the C99 maths functions.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -