Message-ID:	<001801c2b889$a77d6b00$0100a8c0@acp42g>
From:	"Andrew Cottrell" <acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au>
To:	"Richard Dawe" <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Cc:	<djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com>
References:	<E18Wgm9-0000da-00 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <008501c2b86e$96f64330$0100a8c0 AT acp42g>
Subject:	Re: fileutils 4.1: Cumulative patch post-rel4 [PATCH]
Date:	Fri, 10 Jan 2003 20:20:56 +1100
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-Priority:	3
X-MSMail-Priority:	Normal
X-Mailer:	Microsoft Outlook Express 6.00.2800.1106
X-MimeOLE:	Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.00.2800.1106
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

> > Andrew, can you apply this next time you do a build for testing?
> > (You will need to apply the patch I've posted to fix bugs in /dev/zero,
> > if it hasn't been committed.)
>
> I have applied these patches and when the /dev/zero gets commited I will
do
> a build.

Richard,

I just did a CVS get and did a build and I now have an rm.exe that does not
work correctly as indicated below. Is this expected because one of the
patches that is need to get it working is missing or is it a bug?

The following is the failure:-

    DJGPP_204 D:\dj204\gnu\sh-util2.01\lib>dir yesno.o

     Directory of D:\dj204\gnu\sh-util2.01\lib
    08/01/2003  08:56 PM             2,850 yesno.o

    DJGPP_204 D:\dj204\gnu\sh-util2.01\lib>rm -f yesno.o
    rm: cannot unlink `yesno.o': Operation not permitted (EPERM)

The rm.exe that I build a few days ago worked and the one from clio also
works.

Thanks,
Andrew

- Raw text -