Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E1D9E47.1B9B9A23@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 09 Jan 2003 16:07:35 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: m4 port: return program name as 'm4' not '/some/path/m4.exe'[PATCH]
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1030109075038 DOT 16256B-100000 AT is>
	<3E1D3BDE DOT C5BDCF79 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <1042113439 DOT 10441 DOT 21 DOT camel AT leeloo>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Tim Van Holder wrote:
[snip]
> Ho hum - I was talking in the context of a path search (I highly doubt
> running 'test -x' will _ever_ do a path search by itself; 'test -x rm'
> won't return true unless you're in /bin or /usr/bin or whatever).
> 
> In the case of using
> 
>   test -x /usr/local/bin/m4
> 
> however, test -x WILL return true if /usr/local/bin/m4 refers to a
> directory (that the current user can cd into). You'd need 'test -f foo
> && test -x foo' for a more foolproof test.
> 
> And that is what happened in autoconf's AC_PROG_PATH if 'test -x' was
> used as executable test instead of 'test -f'

Ah, thanks for clarifying. My conversions of 'test -f' to 'test -x' in the
autoconf 2.57 test suite (in the DJGPP port) should be fine, then. (But I am
planning to go back and convert it to use 'test -f' and $EXEEXT sometime.)

Thanks, bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -