From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200301021809.h02I9mG22840@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: stubify
In-Reply-To:	<Pine.LNX.4.50.0301020746190.18498-100000@laser4.metsahovi.fgi.fi>
	"from andris AT hal DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv at Jan 2, 2003 07:50:32 am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Thu, 2 Jan 2003 19:09:48 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore:	s
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to andris AT hal DOT astr DOT lu DOT lv:
> I thought sometimes about using stubedit and putting support of setting
> stack size from GCC command line (Simply I needed less modifications for
> stubedit rather than for stubify). Of course possibility to use stubify
> for that is better. In this case we could provide support for something like
> 	-stack=1024K
> in GCC command line (one can easily specify it in LDFLAGS in Makefile)
> for next updates of DJGPP port of GCC

Does it matter what the option is named? I was thinking of "-s".

By the way there's another bug!:

int main(int argc, char **argv)
{
  int i;
  if (argc > 1 && strcmp(argv[1], "-v")==0)
  {
    verbose = 1;
    argv++;
    argc--;
  }
  v_printf("stubify for djgpp V2.X executables, Copyright (C) 1995 DJ Delorie\n");
  if (argc < 2)
  {
    fprintf(stderr, "Usage: stubify [-g] <program>  (program may be COFF or stubbed .exe,\n");
    fprintf(stderr, "  and may be COFF with .exe extension.  Resulting file will have .exe)\n");


Note the option in the help text is "-g" and the option we test for is
"-v".


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -