Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3E06F1F2.2520735C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Mon, 23 Dec 2002 11:22:26 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: GDB 5.3 branch cut out
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021204081007 DOT 29445E-100000 AT is> <006301c29b84$f771bd90$0100a8c0 AT p4>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Andrew Cottrell wrote:
> 
> > The GDB maintainer has created a branch for the v5.3 release.  If someone
> > has time to get that branch via anon CVS or by fetching the daily
> > snapshot, please try to build the DJGPP port and see if there are any
> > problems.
> 
> So far I have come accros the following two issues:-
[snip]
> 2) The build fails in the readline directory as follows. There were no code
> changes in the readline directory between GDB 5.2.1 and 5.2.9.1, but it the
> config,h was empty (had the header) after running the 5.2.9.1 configure
> stage.
[snip]
> If I use the config.h from GDB 5.2.1 then the readline library is built and
> I get a gdb.exe.

I built from gdb-5.3.tar.gz off some GNU mirror in the UK. It built fine. It
have a non-empty readline/config.h file. This is against DJGPP CVS from a week
or so ago with fileutils, sh-utils and textutils built with the
multiple-consecutive-slash patch for symlinks applied.
 
> I don't have time to investigate this further or tun the testsuite until the
> weekend.

The test suite worked fine.

Any objections, if I prepare packages?

I was also thinking of doing new packages for gdb 5.2.1, since there are no
info docs in the binary package.

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -