delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Sender: | rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk |
Message-ID: | <3DFB815F.5212018C@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
Date: | Sat, 14 Dec 2002 19:07:11 +0000 |
From: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Subject: | Re: [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1] |
References: | <3DF7C2BD DOT 31601BA7 AT yahoo DOT com> <Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021212075923 DOT 15584F-100000 AT is> <20021212135449 DOT GA4441 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3DF9D928 DOT E78ECF4D AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <20021213135345 DOT GA19578 AT kendall DOT sfbr DOT org> <3DFB4DD0 DOT 335457CC AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> <200212141739 DOT gBEHdA501566 AT envy DOT delorie DOT com> |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Hello. DJ Delorie wrote: [snip] > If the list gets too big, the sheer size will discourate people from > reading it. I'm trying to balance it so that it is most helpful to > the most people. Do you think autoconf and automake fall into this > category? I wouldn't think anyone who isn't developing software would > need them, and since a majority of djgpp users only use the > prepackaged software, I don't see it as a major issue. autoconf and automake don't really fall into that category. I'll leave the list as-is. > On the other hand, I would really like simtel to have the latest > rhide, and add rhide to the list. That gets asked about a lot. I agree that RHIDE belongs on that list. Given the number of FAQs about RHIDE 1.4.9, I wonder when 1.5.0 will be out. Thanks, bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |