Mail Archives: djgpp-workers/2002/12/14/10:28:28
Hello.
JT Williams wrote:
>
> -: Thanks for the list! If there are no objections, I'll update the mini-FAQ
> -: at the weekend with revision numbers for the other packages.
>
> Don't take the list I posted too seriously; I made up some of those
> release numbers only to help me keep track of package releases. In
> general, neither a package release (r[1-9]) nor a package revision
> (r[0-9]) is indicated in the *.ver file for the package (although
> doing so might be a good idea).
It looks like automake 1.5 is the only package on that list (apart from the
fileutils packages) that has 'release n' in its .ver or .dsm file. There
doesn't seem much point listing the release number in the mini-FAQ, if there's
no way of telling which release you currently have.
BTW I was thinking of adding autoconf and automake to the mini-FAQ. Any
objections?
Thanks, bye, Rich =]
--
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
- Raw text -