Sender:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-ID:	<3DF8776C.A77EDFE3@phekda.freeserve.co.uk>
Date:	Thu, 12 Dec 2002 11:47:56 +0000
From:	Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586)
X-Accept-Language:	de,fr
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: scanf buffer overflow; support 'hh' conversion specifier [PATCH]
References:	<200212121119 DOT MAA24949 AT lws256 DOT lu DOT erisoft DOT se>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Hello.

Martin Stromberg wrote:
[snip]
> It's not in C89 for *scanf(). But it's there for *printf(). We _are_
> talking about *scanf(), right (buffer overflow)?
[snip]

Yes. So:

C89: No X exists => X can be a Borland-compatible thing.
C99: X exists and should behave like x => X must comply with the C99 standard,
not be Borland-compatible (unless it's the same).

Bye, Rich =]

-- 
Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]

- Raw text -