From:	<ams AT ludd DOT luth DOT se>
Message-Id:	<200212112017.gBBKHaB15505@speedy.ludd.luth.se>
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
In-Reply-To:	<10212111759.AA24198@clio.rice.edu> "from Charles Sandmann at Dec
	11, 2002 11:59:20 am"
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 21:17:36 +0100 (CET)
X-Mailer:	ELM [version 2.4ME+ PL78 (25)]
MIME-Version:	1.0
X-MailScanner:	Found to be clean
X-MailScanner-SpamScore:	s
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

According to Charles Sandmann:
> >     http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/djgpp/2.04/status204.html
> 
> Thanks, looks good.  Under incompatibilities section, might mention
> new symlink format (V2.03 won't understand them).  But I still don't think
> this will be a big deal since nothing else outside the DJGPP toolchain
> will understand them either.

Ehum. Didn't we adopt the format from cygwin or something?


Right,

						MartinS

- Raw text -