delorie.com/archives/browse.cgi | search |
Sender: | rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk |
Message-ID: | <3DF76386.5CBCDF0A@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> |
Date: | Wed, 11 Dec 2002 16:10:46 +0000 |
From: | Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk> |
X-Mailer: | Mozilla 4.77 [en] (X11; U; Linux 2.2.23 i586) |
X-Accept-Language: | de,fr |
MIME-Version: | 1.0 |
To: | DJGPP workers <djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com> |
Subject: | [Fwd: ANNOUNCE: Release 4 of DJGPP port of fileutils 4.1] |
Reply-To: | djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com |
Richard Dawe wrote: [snip] > CBFalconer wrote: > [snip] > > Is there any particular reason for not identifying the zip as > > being revised, such as "fil41-4.zip"? There is no clue to this in > > the mini-faq postings. > > We could include this information in the mini-FAQ, e.g.: "fileutils-4.1 rel. > 4" or "fileutils-4.1r4", if "fileutils-4.1 release 4" takes up too much > space. > > I wonder what DJ thinks. [snip] Any objections if I update the mini-FAQ to have fileutils-4.1r4 in it? Bye, Rich =] -- Richard Dawe [ http://www.phekda.freeserve.co.uk/richdawe/ ]
webmaster | delorie software privacy |
Copyright © 2019 by DJ Delorie | Updated Jul 2019 |