From:	"Mark E." <snowball3 AT softhome DOT net>
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Date:	Wed, 11 Dec 2002 10:26:51 -0500
MIME-Version:	1.0
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
Message-ID:	<3DF712EB.20674.B6B0E@localhost>
In-reply-to:	<10212111423.AA22481@clio.rice.edu>
References:	<00ca01c2a0fd$a1d8b860$0100a8c0 AT p4> from "Andrew Cottrell" at Dec 11, 2002 09:10:41 PM
X-mailer:	Pegasus Mail for Windows (v4.02a)
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Next question.  Why is the binutils changing the coff headers?  Maybe
> we should go back to an earlier binutils unless something in it is
> absolutely required.

And exactly what change in binutils troubles upx?

Mark

- Raw text -