Message-ID:	<3DF644DC.D953275C@yahoo.com>
Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2002 14:47:41 -0500
From:	CBFalconer <cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com>
Organization:	Ched Research
X-Mailer:	Mozilla 4.75 [en] (Win98; U)
X-Accept-Language:	en
MIME-Version:	1.0
To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 status page updates: more to-dos, priorities
References:	<10212101635 DOT AA17564 AT clio DOT rice DOT edu>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com

Charles Sandmann wrote:
> 
... snip ...
> 
> > 4 Should we compress distributed binaries using UPX?
> 
> I'd like to know exactly what breaks this ... If it's some new
> binutils feature we can live without ...

Why bother?  The end user can do it.  pakke might be organized to
do it on the fly (if I ever get inspired to actually try pakke).

-- 
Chuck F (cbfalconer AT yahoo DOT com) (cbfalconer AT worldnet DOT att DOT net)
   Available for consulting/temporary embedded and systems.
   <http://cbfalconer.home.att.net>  USE worldnet address!

- Raw text -