Date:	Tue, 10 Dec 2002 22:33:24 +0300
From:	"Eli Zaretskii" <eliz AT is DOT elta DOT co DOT il>
Sender:	halo1 AT zahav DOT net DOT il
To:	rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk
Message-Id:	<8011-Tue10Dec2002223324+0200-eliz@is.elta.co.il>
X-Mailer:	emacs 21.3.50 (via feedmail 8 I) and Blat ver 1.8.9
CC:	acottrel AT ihug DOT com DOT au, djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
In-reply-to:	<3DF5AFB6.1E35E3F0@phekda.freeserve.co.uk> (message from Richard
	Dawe on Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:11:18 +0000)
Subject:	Re: DJGPP 2.04 problem list
References:	<Pine DOT SUN DOT 3 DOT 91 DOT 1021210074743 DOT 16020A-100000 AT is> <3DF5AFB6 DOT 1E35E3F0 AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
Reply-To:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
Errors-To:	nobody AT delorie DOT com
X-Mailing-List:	djgpp-workers AT delorie DOT com
X-Unsubscribes-To:	listserv AT delorie DOT com

> Date: Tue, 10 Dec 2002 09:11:18 +0000
> From: Richard Dawe <rich AT phekda DOT freeserve DOT co DOT uk>
> 
> makefile.inc invokes 'ld' directly, to build the program.

So does the linker script make the difference?  Anyway, adding -v to
the link command line (the one that does produce correct DWARF2 info)
will show you how does GCC invoke ld to DTRT.  We then should correct
the makefile rules to do the same.

> If I copy lib/gcc-lib/3.21/djgpp-x.djl to lib/djgpp.djl, I can build and debug
> the test programs with DWARF-2 OK.

Does Mark's patch to djgpp.djl fixes this?

- Raw text -